Amos – The House of Joseph

Last time we made observations in Amos 5:4-6. Actually, I included verse six for context but we never discussed it. Here are the same verses again, but this time verses four and five lend the context for our examination of verse six.

Amos 5:4-6

          4 For thus says the LORD to the house of Israel:

   “Seek Me and live;

          5 But do not seek Bethel,

   Nor enter Gilgal,

   Nor pass over to Beersheba;

   For Gilgal shall surely go into captivity,

   And Bethel shall come to nothing.

          6 Seek the LORD and live,

   Lest He break out like fire in the house of Joseph,

   And devour it,

   With no one to quench it in Bethel—

In a previous discussion we observed the prophecy to be applicable to the whole nation of Israel because we find the phrase “house of Israel” in the text. We observed that all twelve tribes of made up the house of Israel. But here in verse six the prophet warns that God may, “break out like fire in the house of Joseph”. Why would God specifically call out the house of Joseph in his prophecy against the northern kingdom?

Consider the following from the Lexham Glossary of Theology:

northern kingdom — The ten northern tribes of Israel who rejected the rule of Solomon’s successor Rehoboam and formed a separate kingdom under Jeroboam son of Nebat around 922 BC. This kingdom was known as Israel (and Ephraim in some poetic literature) while the southern kingdom was known as Judah. The northern kingdom was conquered and absorbed by the Assyrians in 722 BC.

Mangum, Douglas. The Lexham Glossary of Theology. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2014. Print.

 

The northern kingdom was comprised of ten of the tribes of the nation Israel, with Ephraim being the largest. The southern kingdom was made up from the tribes Judah and Benjamin, with Judah being the largest of the two. It was common to refer to each of the kingdoms by their largest tribes. Southern kingdom, Judah. Northern kingdom, Ephraim. How does that get us to the phrase house of Joseph here in Amos 5:6?

Genesis chapter 41 tells us Joseph had two sons, Manasseh and Ephraim. You remember the story. Jacob (renamed Israel) had twelve sons total, but two of them were from the wife that he truly loved. Those sons were Joseph and his younger brother Benjamin. Joseph was betrayed by his brothers and became an Egyptian leader who essentially saved the then known world from famine.

It is interesting to note that when the tribes are enumerated in the Old Testament the half tribes of Manasseh and Ephraim are named, and not their father Joseph. I have often wondered if it has anything to do with the fact that Joseph lived as an Egyptian instead of a Hebrew. We do see Joseph listed again with his brothers as national patriarchs in Revelation 7:8 talking about the 144,000 witnesses. I would like to say more about the Revelation passage, but alas it is a study in and of itself.

One more consideration may shed some light on the phrase “house of Joseph”. Look at Genesis 41:51-52

          51 Joseph called the name of the firstborn Manasseh: “For God has made me forget all my toil and all my father’s house.”

          52 And the name of the second he called Ephraim: “For God has caused me to be fruitful in the land of my affliction.”

In these two verses Joseph tells us the meaning of both of his son’s names. Manasseh – to forget, and Ephraim – to be fruitful. If the fire falls on the house of Joseph it will burn up the relief typified by the meaning of the names of his son’s.

As I discover beautiful nuggets of truth hidden in God’s Holy Word I am struck by the intricacy and intentionality of His Word. I also feel sorrow and pity for the skeptic who misses the unique literary beauty of the Bible. They exchange that beauty for an endless pursuit of contradictions in the Bible, attempting to prove that God, creator of the universe and redeemer of mankind, is not the author of this ancient book.

We should read the Bible devotionally, keeping in mind that it is not easy reading. We should study the Bible thoroughly, remembering that we will never know it fully. We should obey the Bible’s commands, knowing that obedience to His Word pleases God.

1 Samuel 15:22

          22 So Samuel said:

   “Has the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices,

   As in obeying the voice of the LORD?

   Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice,

   And to heed than the fat of rams.

 

All Scripture quotation are from The New King James Version. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1982. Print.


3 Replies to "Amos - The House of Joseph"

  • Roger streifel
    July 15, 2018 (11:16 am)
    Reply

    Very interesting insight as to the meaning of the “house of Joseph.” That does make sense.

  • PAMELA SHAMBAUGH
    March 10, 2021 (11:21 pm)
    Reply

    The blessings of Jacob (Israel) on his sons and grandsons in Genesis 48:16-22 and Genesis 49. It is clear in 49:1 that this applied to the last days. These 12 tribes and Ephraim and Manasseh would each become nations. Ephraim is the United States and Manasseh is the UK. Isaiah 11:13 Ephraim shall not envy Judah, and Judah shall not vex Ephraim. USA and Israel. Zechariah 10:6 I will strengthen the house of Judah and I will save the house of Joseph… verse 7 And they of Ephraim shall be like a mighty man and their heart shall rejoice as through wine: yea their children shall see it, and be glad; their heart shall rejoice in the Lord. When I have bent Judah for me, filled the bow with Ephraim… I believe in these days the House of Joseph and Ephraim will be very important!

    • Mark Hathaway
      March 11, 2021 (4:11 pm)
      Reply

      I really, REALLY appreciate that you read this post and that you took the time to express some ideas. However, I have to disagree with you. The notion that Ephraim is the United States and Manasseh in the UK is from something called British Israelism and is based on a concept called replacement theology. Here’s a quick but decent summary httpss://www.gotquestions.org/British-Israelism.html. The notion that the United States “replaces” a tribe and the “UK” replaces a tribe is simply false. Replacement theology basically states that because Israel rejected Jesus the Christ, the church “replaced” Israel. These notions are completely contrary to a literal interpretation of the Bible and you need to be careful because it changes the meaning and message God intended when He had it penned. Additionally, Biblical meaning never changes or evolves. Ephraim/Manasseh could not mean Ephraim and Manasseh when it was originally penned, and then somehow changed to mean two different nations once they came into existence.

      What you are doing is called allegorizing the text. Instead of just reading the text for what it says people look for some other “spiritual” or hidden meaning. If you dig a little deeper into British Israelism you’ll discover that it is considered a pseudoarchaeological belief. Archeological finds have actually disproved many of the claims postulated by this belief system.

      Just a note about the other verses you noted. When we quote a single verse or two we need to make sure we are not taking them out of context. When we take them out of the context (historical, cultural, and textual) we run a very real risk of making them mean something other than they would if they were left in their context.

      I hope you will keep learning, keep studying, and keep growing in your faith. As you read and study the Bible I would encourage you and us all to allow God’s word to challenge our preconceived ideas and conclusions.
      Thanks.


Got something to say?

Some html is OK